clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

GQ Names Los Angeles the 2nd Worst Dressed City in America

New, 11 comments
As right as they got Newport Beach at right (hey, we used to live there), they're 90% wrong about LA
As right as they got Newport Beach at right (hey, we used to live there), they're 90% wrong about LA

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

You know how on the internet, sometimes it's challenging to differentiate sarcasm from true reportage? Consider GQ's roundup of the 40 Worst Dressed Cities in America. It's hard to argue with some of the photographic evidence, particularly in cities like Boulder, Seattle, and Burlington, VT. But do we really believe everyone in San Diego dresses like Ron Burgundy? Southern California is represented, in spades: besides SD, there's, Newport Beach and our fair city, which came in at #2. It's clear that LA has an image problem, since people still think our men go out dressed head-to-toe in Ed Hardy and that our "?most enduring sartorial contribution to the planet is leggings."

A couple of things we ask in all sincerity: if this is the list of the worst, where's the list of the best? And can you really trust any magazine that's still advising its readers to wear clothing inspired by the Royal Tenenbaums?
· The 40 Worst-Dressed Cities in America [GQ]
· The Inspiration: The Royal Tenenbaums [GQ]